- The House of Wisdom
- Posts
- How to build an 800-year old church without a single iron nail
How to build an 800-year old church without a single iron nail
Medieval architecture might not be as simple as we once thought
Happy Friday folks,
The Borgund Stave Church in Norway is one of the most remarkable medieval, wooden buildings in existence. It was built 800 years ago and has anything and everything you would expect of a marvel of architecture standing in the middle of a forest: dark, weathered timbers, tiered roofs, and dragon-headed carvings.
But what makes the Borgund Stave Church even more extraordinary is not its stunning exterior, it’s the fact that not a single (metal) nail was used to build it…

Borgund Stave Church, Lærdal, Norway (1180)
The secret lies in the material itself: Wood.
It sounds simple (and maybe even boring) but wood was the perfect material for this type of construction, with its natural strength and flexibility. Different types of timber were carefully selected based on their properties: oak was prized for its durability, pine for its workability, and cedar for its resistance to decay.
Builders often worked with freshly cut timber, as it was easier to shape, but they allowed the wood to cure and season naturally before construction to minimize warping. In the case of the Borgund Stave Church, timber was treated with tar to repel moisture and insects.
(The term "stave" itself refers to the wooden posts, or staves, that form the church’s structural skeleton. These are held together using joinery techniques that rely on precision rather than metal fasteners.)

Looking up at the roof of Borgund Stave Church
But how was it possible to build something so everlasting, and why was this method even chosen?
Each joint was meticulously crafted to create a snug fit that could bear immense loads while allowing for slight movement — a vital feature for wooden buildings that expand and contract with changing temperatures and humidity.
This flexibility is why the church has stood for over 800 years
Something else worth noting is that when parts of the structure were beginning to rot away or fall apart, it would be much easier to take apart those sections of buildings, replace them and then put them back together.
While you wouldn’t be able to find a single iron nail here, one of the most intriguing features of the church's construction is the clever use of wedged wooden nails (something commonly found in Viking shipbuilding). Recent investigations estimate that over 10,000 were used to support the building.
40% of these nails boast an extra wedge. It’s a genius technique that allowed them to be locked securely as the wood ages and shrinks, whereas ordinary wooden nails would have fallen out.
It would be an arduous task to not just secure these nails but also make them. Researchers say that it could take around 20 days for one worker to produce all the nails needed for the wooden shingles on the roof of Borgund Stave Church.

A humble Reminder: Our Subscriptions are live on 𝕏!
You can help to directly support the newsletter and get access to bonus content before it is published anywhere else...
As amazing as it is, the Borgund Stave Church isn’t an isolated marvel. Cultures across the world have used similar techniques to create some of history's most enduring wooden structures — Japan offers a fascinating parallel.
The Japanese tradition of building temples and shrines without nails — referred to as kanawatsugi (joinery) — is a marvel of architectural engineering. Structures like the Hōryū-ji Temple remain among the oldest surviving wooden buildings in the world. The techniques involved in building them are somewhat similar to those in Norway’s staev churches. Intricate wooden joints and interlocking systems that are so precise, they hold together through the forces of gravity and friction alone.

The Hōryū-ji Temple, Japan, built in the 7th century.
What makes this tradition so enduring in Japan is its philosophical underpinning. Japanese builders treated wood as a living material.
They understood its grain, strength, and flexibility, designing joints that complemented these characteristics. Mortise-and-tenon joints, for instance, involved a projecting "tenon" fitting precisely into a corresponding "mortise." These techniques weren’t just about practicality — they embodied Buddhist ideals, particularly the concept of mujō (impermanence).
in doing so, they created buildings that flex with seismic forces rather than resist them rigidly, creating earthquake-resilient wooden structures that can last longer than most modern concrete counterparts.
And this type of architecture extends beyond Norway and Japan. Consider Kizhi Pogost, a church in Russia built in just a span of one year in 1714.
Its 22 wooden domes, crowned with hand-crafted shingles, are held together by interlocking joints. It’s particularly interesting as it shows the sheer monumental scale wooden architecture can reach — again without using a single nail.

Kizhi Pogost, Kareila, Russia (1714)
And there is a whole city crafted without a single nail too: the Forbidden City in Beijing, China.
Although its monumental palaces are primarily stone, the wooden elements — like the Great Hall of Supreme Harmony — are all built with interlocking wooden beams and columns. This system is called dougong, a type of bracketry that provides stability.
(The roofs, meticulously layered with tiles and decorative ridges, are supported by this system allowing them to stand firm against the heavy load of the tiles.)
Much attention is given to the intricacies of this system, but the use of rammed earth in the foundation and walls played an equally critical role, helping to distribute the weight of the towering wooden beams so that the whole complex wouldn’t collapse in on itself.
And best of all, it stand 600 years later in the same glory as it was initially built (with help from a 16 year-long restoration project in 2005).

Forbidden City, Peking, China (1406)
What unites these structures, whether in Norway, Japan, Russia, or beyond, is their reliance on craft rather than industrial materials. These buildings weren’t mass-produced; they were the product of skilled artisans who understood the limited resources they had to work with.
Yet with so many constraints, they still stand as true wonders of architecture (without a single nail) and continue to inspire us centuries later.
Until Next Time,
World Scholar

P.S. Thank You for getting this far! What topic should we dive into next? Let me know directly by replying to this email!
Reply